Written disclosure duty
Covered chain restaurants owe a written major-food-allergen disclosure per item, effective July 1, 2026. Every in-scope standard item gets a Big-9 call or an explicit HOLD.
AllergenPack assembles a documentation-complete Menu Allergen Completeness Pack — an item-level Big-9 Matrix, print-ready disclosure copy, the non-digital Written Alternative, the channel checklist, and a source-trace appendix — every allergen call backed by a source span from your own recipes and released by a named culinary/allergen-ops specialist.
Since July 1, 2026, any restaurant brand with 20+ same-name US locations and a California door carries a written Big-9 allergen disclosure duty under Cal. Health & Safety Code §114093.5 — per item, across every channel, with a non-digital written alternative required whenever any channel is digital.
But the evidence that should drive that disclosure lives in scattered recipe cards and supplier specs, sesame hides in glazes and marinades, and nobody has mapped a full Big-9 Matrix against the current menu. A supplier swaps a formulation and the disclosure silently goes stale.
AllergenPack closes that gap with one evidence-only standard applied identically to every item, every channel, every release.
We do not summarize the statute and hope. Every pack is scored against a versioned rule pack tied to the exact text of California's written allergen disclosure law and its coverage test. These are the provisions each pack is held to.
Covered chain restaurants owe a written major-food-allergen disclosure per item, effective July 1, 2026. Every in-scope standard item gets a Big-9 call or an explicit HOLD.
Whenever any deployment channel is digital or QR-based, a non-digital written alternative is required. A digital channel with no written alternative is a hard fail that blocks release.
The statutory definition of the nine major food allergens governs the Matrix — sesame is tracked as its own category, never folded into another.
SB 68 mirrors the federal menu-labeling trigger — 20+ same-name US locations with substantially the same menu — applied as the coverage test, with at least one California location.
California Retail Food Code violations generally run as a misdemeanor, $25-$1,000 and/or up to six months — the exposure a complete, deployed disclosure is built to close the openings for.
Each day of a continuing violation may constitute a separate offense — which is why drift between channels is treated as a defect, not a footnote.
AI extracts ingredients with verbatim source spans. Deterministic rules run the Big-9 mapping. A named culinary/allergen-ops specialist clears every exception and signs every release. That order is never reversed.
Send recipe cards, supplier specification sheets, current menus, and your channel inventory. Ambiguous item matches go to a human, not a guess.
AI pulls the Big-9-relevant ingredients from every document, each with a verbatim source span and a confidence score. Anything without a source routes to specialist triage.
Big-9 calls run through versioned rules, not model judgment alone: no blank cells, sesame always its own column, and absence of evidence is Unknown — never a guessed No.
A named culinary/allergen-ops specialist clears every Exception Queue item — resolved with evidence, or marked HOLD — and signs the release record before anything ships.
The PDF pack and an editable Matrix land the same day as release, with a 30-minute deployment walkthrough, a channel checklist, and a 30-day deployment confirmation check.
The deliverable is completeness itself — every Big-9 cell sourced or explicitly held. A recipe platform stores what your team types in; at 20-120 locations, nobody has typed in every supplier substitution.
No ingredient call ships without a cited source span, and deterministic rules — not a model's confidence — enforce completeness. The Matrix is one a reviewer won't unwind.
AllergenPack produces an evidence-based completeness pack. It is not a law firm or a clinical provider, issues no allergen-free certification, and the brand/Person in Charge stays legally responsible for accuracy and deployment under the California Retail Food Code.
Outcome-based pricing for completeness-pack production — not for a legal or financial outcome — anchored against a few months of menu-audit SaaS spend.
Run the free Menu Allergen Gap Scan — submit a public menu URL or PDF and we'll return an itemized read against the SB 68 coverage test and your Big-9 exposure within 2 business days.
Documentation-support service · not legal or medical advice · no allergen-free certification · the brand deploys every disclosure.
[PLACEHOLDER] First-cohort pack turnaround time — published here once real restaurant clients complete an intake-to-delivered-pack cycle. No SLA number is claimed before it is measured.
[PLACEHOLDER] First restaurant reference — added only with a named pilot client's written permission. AllergenPack never invents a testimonial or a logo.
[PLACEHOLDER] Total menu allergen packs delivered to date — a live, auditable count once real packs have shipped, never estimated.