Rate-table compliance
Every timekeeper's rate is verified against the client's approved rate table; unapproved timekeepers are flagged and reduced.
ClearLAE assembles a documentation-complete legal bill review pack — every line item checked against your billing guidelines, every reduction attorney-supervised, every exception report defensible for reinsurers and regulators — before a specialist releases it.
Roughly 56% of defense invoices contain errors or guideline violations: block billing, vague entries, unapproved timekeepers, rate creep, intra-office conferencing, clerical work billed at attorney rates, unbudgeted research, and math errors. At a $10M defense-spend organization, 5–10% leakage is $500k–$1M/yr walking out the door.
Most mid-market carriers, MGAs, TPAs, and risk pools review invoices by hand — adjusters with 120-file caseloads skimming PDFs. Rules-only e-billing software either under-flags or floods counsel with petty deductions that poison panel relationships. The enterprise programs are sized for $100M+ spend.
ClearLAE exists to close that gap with a single, exhaustive standard applied identically to every file.
We do not summarize the guidelines and hope. Every pack is scored against a versioned rule pack tied to the exact text of your published litigation billing guidelines. These are the provisions each pack is held to.
Every timekeeper's rate is verified against the client's approved rate table; unapproved timekeepers are flagged and reduced.
Narratives are read by AI to detect block-billed entries and vague descriptions (e.g., 'review file') — the leading cause of line-item rejections.
Intra-office conferencing, clerical work, excessive research, and other non-compensable tasks are identified and deducted per guidelines.
All arithmetic is verified; duplicate entries across timekeepers or dates are flagged and eliminated.
For flagged lines, a licensed attorney or senior auditor reviews the narrative against the case phase and litigation plan to determine if the work was reasonable and necessary.
Every reduction is documented with the guideline citation and a clear rationale, producing an exception report that survives law-firm appeal and regulatory scrutiny.
AI extracts and drafts. Deterministic rules — running as code, outside the model — decide what is complete. A human specialist signs every release. That order is never reversed.
Upload a sample of recent invoices and your billing guidelines. We return a free completeness read: which guideline elements are being missed and the estimated leakage percentage.
As your authorized clerical agent, we ingest LEDES 1998B files or PDF invoices, normalize them to a structured format, and extract all line-item data.
LLM narrative reading extracts task codes, detects block-billing and vagueness, and codes each line against the guideline rule pack.
Rate-table compliance is verified; math is checked; prohibited tasks are flagged; any failure blocks release.
A licensed attorney or senior auditor reviews the exception queue, adjudicates reasonableness, and signs the reduction report.
You receive the pack: audited invoice with reductions, exception report with guideline citations, appeal-ready documentation, and quarterly panel-counsel scorecards.
The deliverable is completeness itself — every line item checked against your guidelines, every reduction documented with a citation. Nothing is left implicit.
The gates that decide completeness are code, not a model's opinion. A drafting error cannot slip past a guideline requirement.
We prepare documentation and run searches as your clerical agent. We never contact the law firm, give legal advice, or conduct the sale.
Simple, predictable, and aligned with a documentation standard — not a cut of any recovery.
Start with a free Leakage Gap Scan. Send a sample of recent invoices and your billing guidelines, and we'll return a completeness read against every guideline element.
Documentation-completeness service · not legal advice · the carrier sends every notice.