Eligibility screening
Every claim is screened for NSA coverage, timely filing, and qualifying payment amount (QPA) threshold — all present, or the submission does not release.
ClaimArbiter assembles a documentation-complete IDR submission package — eligibility screening, batching, QPA analysis, offer rationale, and attestations — checked against the letter of 45 C.F.R. Part 149 before a compliance specialist releases it.
A provider's IDR submission is only as strong as the documentation behind it. Miss an eligibility requirement, skip a deadline, mis-batch claims, or fail to write a persuasive offer rationale — and the dispute can be ruled ineligible, dismissed, or result in a low award.
Most mid-market providers run this by hand, from memory, once or twice a year. The regulations have not been read end-to-end since the last time it mattered. That is exactly where completeness gaps hide.
ClaimArbiter exists to close that gap with a single, exhaustive standard applied identically to every dispute.
We do not summarize the law and hope. Every submission is scored against a versioned rule pack tied to the exact text of 45 C.F.R. Part 149. These are the provisions each submission is held to.
Every claim is screened for NSA coverage, timely filing, and qualifying payment amount (QPA) threshold — all present, or the submission does not release.
Claims are batched only when they involve the same item/service, same payer, same plan, and same dispute period — verified deterministically, never estimated.
The QPA is extracted from the remittance and compared to the provider's billed amount; the offer rationale must demonstrate why the QPA is not appropriate.
A written justification citing the statutory factors (patient acuity, training, market share, etc.) and supporting evidence — drafted from validated data, no invented facts.
A compliance specialist reviews and signs the attestation; high-dollar or complex disputes route to attorney review first.
The 4-business-day initiation window and 30-business-day response window are tracked and enforced; any failure blocks release.
AI extracts and drafts. Deterministic rules — running as code, outside the model — decide what is complete. A human compliance specialist signs every release. That order is never reversed.
Upload a claims feed and remittances. We return a free eligibility read: which claims are NSA-covered, which deadlines apply, and which are missing documentation.
As your authorized agent, we extract QPA, billed amounts, and service codes from remittances and build the dispute matrix, corroborated across sources.
The offer rationale is drafted from validated data and the 45 C.F.R. rule pack into field-locked templates — no legal opinions, no invented facts.
Eligibility is verified; batching rules are enforced; deadlines are checked; QPA analysis is reconciled; attestation is reviewed. Any failure blocks release.
A compliance specialist reviews the exception queue and signs the release. High-dollar or complex disputes route to attorney review first.
You receive the submission package: dispute forms, offer rationale, evidence log, attestation, and tracking calendar — ready for the provider to submit under its own name.
The deliverable is completeness itself — every regulatory element and analysis accounted for or explicitly exception-coded. Nothing is left implicit.
The gates that decide completeness are code, not a model's opinion. A drafting error cannot slip past a regulatory requirement.
We prepare documentation and run analyses as your clerical agent. We never give legal advice, contact the payer, or submit the dispute on your behalf.
Simple, predictable, and aligned with a documentation standard — not a cut of any recovery.
Start with a free Eligibility Scan. Send your claims feed and remittances and we'll return an eligibility read against every subsection of 45 C.F.R. Part 149.
Documentation-completeness service · not legal advice · the provider submits every dispute.