Five report elements
Product identification, intentionally added PFAS declaration, fluoropolymer/PTFE inclusion, supplier attestation, and fee — all present, or the pack does not release.
InventoryFirst assembles a documentation-complete PFAS regulatory report — every statutory element, every required supplier attestation, the BOM-to-regulation mapping, the PRISM portal submission, and the reusable inventory — checked against the letter of Minnesota's Amara's Law before a specialist releases it.
A manufacturer's PFAS-in-products report is only as strong as the inventory behind it. Miss one of the five statutory elements, skip a required supplier attestation, mis-time the September 15, 2026 deadline, or fail to identify a fluoropolymer — and the report can be rejected, penalized, or expose the manufacturer to $30,000 per day in civil penalties.
Most manufacturers run this by hand, from memory, once or twice a year. The statute has not been read end-to-end since the last time it mattered. That is exactly where completeness gaps hide.
InventoryFirst exists to close that gap with a single, exhaustive standard applied identically to every file.
We do not summarize the law and hope. Every pack is scored against a versioned rule pack tied to the exact text of Minn. Stat. §116.943. These are the provisions each pack is held to.
Product identification, intentionally added PFAS declaration, fluoropolymer/PTFE inclusion, supplier attestation, and fee — all present, or the pack does not release.
The initial report date is verified to fall no later than September 15, 2026, computed deterministically — never estimated.
Manufacturer plus all suppliers in the product's BOM, with attested declarations — established by search, not assumption.
For products manufactured outside Minnesota, a reasonable supplier attestation search in the jurisdiction of manufacture is ordered and evidenced.
A posting checklist for both the manufacturer and the product, with the exact statutory placement requirements.
The 2-week publication rule, surplus-proceeds handling, and the bill-of-sale title path — sequenced on the calendar so nothing is missed.
AI extracts and drafts. Deterministic rules — running as code, outside the model — decide what is complete. A human specialist signs every release. That order is never reversed.
Upload the product portfolio and supplier list. We return a free completeness read: which statutory elements and searches you already have, and which are missing.
As your authorized clerical agent, we order the supplier attestations, BOM mapping, and PFAS declarations and build the inventory matrix, corroborated across sources.
The five report elements are drafted from your validated data and the §116.943 rule pack into field-locked templates — no legal opinions, no invented facts.
Amounts reconcile to the ledger to the penny; the September 15 deadline is verified; the search checklist is resolved; SCRA is screened. Any failure blocks release.
A notice specialist reviews the exception queue and signs the release. High-value or federally documented products route to attorney review first.
You receive the pack: report, inventory matrix, evidence log, posting checklist, PRISM submission packet with labels, and the 60-day ICS calendar — ready for the manufacturer to file under its own name.
The deliverable is completeness itself — every statutory element and search accounted for or explicitly exception-coded. Nothing is left implicit.
The gates that decide completeness are code, not a model's opinion. A drafting error cannot slip past a statutory requirement.
We prepare documentation and run searches as your clerical agent. We never contact the product owner, give legal advice, or conduct the sale.
Simple, predictable, and aligned with a documentation standard — not a cut of any recovery.
Start with a free Delinquency Gap Scan. Send your product portfolio and supplier list and we'll return a completeness read against every subsection of §116.943.
Documentation-completeness service · not legal advice · the manufacturer sends every notice.