Line-by-line compliance
Every solicitation requirement is mapped to a specific section of the proposal. No requirement is left unaddressed; the matrix is verified before release.
The SBIR/STTR Proposal Production Engine assembles a submission-ready, solicitation-compliant proposal — technical volume, commercialization plan, compliance matrix, budget justification, and every agency-specific form — assembled by an internal AI engine and signed off by a domain-expert grant reviewer before the company's Principal Investigator submits. The founder never operates software; a senior proposal reviewer is the trust interface.
The federal SBIR/STTR programs push roughly $4–6 billion a year in non-dilutive R&D funding to small businesses across 11 participating agencies. Yet Phase I win rates run ~15–25% — tens of thousands of proposals are rejected each year, very often not because the science is weak, but because the proposal missed a solicitation requirement, buried the innovation, or told a thin commercialization story.
Writing one of these is a punishing, document-heavy exercise: parse a dense agency solicitation, build a line-by-line compliance matrix, draft a technical volume against specific review criteria, write a commercialization/broader-impacts narrative, justify a budget to agency fee rules, and marshal a dozen forms and certifications — usually while the founder is also building the actual product.
The SBIR/STTR Proposal Production Engine exists to close that gap with a single, exhaustive standard applied identically to every file.
We do not summarize the solicitation and hope. Every pack is scored against a versioned rule pack tied to the exact text of the agency's solicitation, review criteria, and applicable federal regulations (FAR, DFARS, NIH Grants Policy Statement). These are the provisions each pack is held to.
Every solicitation requirement is mapped to a specific section of the proposal. No requirement is left unaddressed; the matrix is verified before release.
The technical volume and commercialization plan are drafted to explicitly address each review criterion, with traceable claims and evidence.
Proposal preparation costs are priced as a fixed fee per proposal — never contingent on award, never a success fee — fully compliant with federal cost principles.
All required agency forms are completed, validated against agency instructions, and included in the submission packet.
The budget is built from the technical scope, justified to the penny, and checked against agency allowability rules (e.g., salary caps, F&A rates).
The commercialization narrative includes market size, customer discovery, regulatory pathway, and team qualifications — reviewed by a domain expert for credibility.
AI extracts and drafts. Deterministic rules — running as code, outside the model — decide what is complete. A human domain-expert reviewer signs every release. That order is never reversed.
Upload your solicitation and technical inputs. We return a free completeness read: which solicitation requirements and review criteria you already have addressed, and which are missing.
As your authorized clerical agent, we parse the agency solicitation, build a line-by-line compliance matrix, and identify prior-art and topic-fit research needs.
The technical volume, commercialization plan, budget justification, and forms are drafted from your validated inputs and the solicitation rule pack into field-locked templates — no legal opinions, no invented facts.
The compliance matrix is resolved to 100%; the budget reconciles to the penny; the review criteria are explicitly addressed; all forms are validated. Any failure blocks release.
A senior proposal reviewer with real agency review experience reviews the pack and signs the release. High-value or complex proposals route to an additional subject-matter expert.
You receive the pack: technical volume, commercialization plan, compliance matrix, budget justification, all forms, and a submission checklist — ready for the PI to submit under their own name.
The deliverable is completeness itself — every solicitation requirement and review criterion accounted for or explicitly exception-coded. Nothing is left implicit.
The gates that decide completeness are code, not a model's opinion. A drafting error cannot slip past a solicitation requirement.
We prepare documentation and run research as your clerical agent. We never submit the proposal, give legal advice, or represent you before the agency.
Simple, predictable, and aligned with federal cost principles (FAR 31.205-33) — not a cut of any award.
Start with a free Delinquency Gap Scan. Send your solicitation and technical inputs and we'll return a completeness read against every requirement and review criterion.
Documentation-completeness service · not legal advice · the PI submits every proposal.