Risk management & strategy
Description of processes for assessing, identifying, and managing material cybersecurity risks, including integration into overall risk management, and whether risks from third-party service providers are considered.
The SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure & Materiality Desk assembles a documentation-complete annual Item 106 disclosure and incident materiality war-room — every required element, every peer benchmark, every say-do gap check, and the outside securities counsel review chain — checked against the SEC's rules and enforcement precedent before a specialist releases it.
Every SEC-reporting company must describe its cybersecurity risk management and board oversight annually in Item 106 of Regulation S-K, and disclose material incidents within four business days under Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. The SEC has already fined issuers a combined multi-million-dollar sum — Unisys alone paid $4 million, R.R. Donnelley paid $2.125 million — for cyber-disclosure and disclosure-controls failures.
Most companies produce this disclosure using expensive law-firm hours, Big-Four advisory engagements, or general-purpose virtual CISO retainers that cover security operations broadly but are not built to produce a defensible, peer-benchmarked, gap-checked annual filing. The result: boilerplate language, say-do gaps, and exposure to enforcement.
The SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure & Materiality Desk exists to close that gap with a single, exhaustive standard applied identically to every engagement.
We do not summarize the rules and hope. Every engagement is scored against a versioned rule pack tied to the exact text of Item 106 of Regulation S-K and Item 1.05 of Form 8-K, plus SEC enforcement actions and staff guidance. These are the provisions each engagement is held to.
Description of processes for assessing, identifying, and managing material cybersecurity risks, including integration into overall risk management, and whether risks from third-party service providers are considered.
Description of board's oversight of cybersecurity risks and management's role in assessing and managing material risks, including relevant expertise and reporting structure.
Disclosure of material cybersecurity incidents within four business days of materiality determination, including nature, scope, timing, and material impact or reasonably likely material impact.
Obligation to amend or update Item 1.05 disclosures if previously undisclosed material information becomes known or if the company's assessment of material impact changes.
Comparison of disclosed practices against actual cybersecurity program documentation, prior disclosures, and peer benchmarks to identify and remediate inconsistencies that could attract SEC scrutiny.
Review of SEC enforcement actions (Unisys, R.R. Donnelley, etc.) to ensure disclosure language avoids patterns that have resulted in penalties, including boilerplate language and inadequate disclosure controls.
AI extracts and drafts. Deterministic rules — running as code, outside the model — decide what is complete. A human specialist signs every release. Outside securities counsel makes every materiality and disclosure-content judgment. That order is never reversed.
Upload your prior-year 10-K, current cybersecurity program documentation, and incident history. We return a free completeness read: which Item 106 elements and benchmarks you already have, and which are missing.
As your authorized clerical agent, we gather facts about your cybersecurity program, benchmark disclosure language against peer 10-Ks and SEC-flagged deficiencies, and build a say-do gap analysis.
The Item 106 disclosure is drafted from your validated data and the SEC rule pack into field-locked templates — no legal opinions, no invented facts. Incident war-room materials are pre-positioned for rapid assembly.
Every required element is checked: risk management description, board oversight, management role, incident disclosure triggers, say-do consistency, and peer benchmarking. Any failure blocks release.
A qualified outside securities counsel reviews the draft disclosure and makes every materiality and disclosure-content judgment. High-value or complex incidents route to additional attorney review.
You receive the engagement pack: filed-ready Item 106 disclosure, say-do gap report, peer benchmarking analysis, incident materiality war-room playbook, and a 12-month calendar for updates — ready for your disclosure controls committee to review and file.
The deliverable is completeness itself — every Item 106 element and benchmark accounted for or explicitly exception-coded. Nothing is left implicit.
The gates that decide completeness are code, not a model's opinion. A drafting error cannot slip past a regulatory requirement.
We prepare documentation and run benchmarks as your clerical agent. We never make materiality determinations, give legal advice, or file disclosures on your behalf.
Simple, predictable, and aligned with a documentation standard — not a cut of any recovery.
Start with a free Gap Scan. Send your prior-year 10-K and current cybersecurity program documentation and we'll return a completeness read against every element of Item 106 and Item 1.05.
Documentation-completeness service · not legal advice · the company retains final filing responsibility.