15-day resolution meeting
The resolution meeting date is verified to fall no later than 15 days after the due process complaint notice, computed deterministically — never estimated.
DueFile assembles a hearing-ready defense file — IEP/service-history timeline, FAPE/procedural-compliance gap analysis, evidence exhibit index, witness list, drafted response, and settlement-exposure memo — checked against the letter of 34 CFR §300.510-300.515 and applicable case law before a licensed attorney of record releases it.
A school district's special-education due-process defense is only as strong as the file behind it. Miss a required IEP timeline element, skip a procedural-compliance flag, mis-time the 15-day resolution meeting, or fail to map a service gap against the FAPE standard — and the district can face liability, settlement pressure, or an adverse hearing decision.
Most districts run this by hand, from memory, once or twice a year. The regulations have not been read end-to-end since the last time it mattered. That is exactly where completeness gaps hide.
DueFile exists to close that gap with a single, exhaustive standard applied identically to every file.
We do not summarize the law and hope. Every file is scored against a versioned rule pack tied to the exact text of 34 CFR §300.510-300.515 and applicable IDEA case law. These are the provisions each file is held to.
The resolution meeting date is verified to fall no later than 15 days after the due process complaint notice, computed deterministically — never estimated.
The resolution period is verified to run 30 days from the complaint notice, with the hearing timeline adjusted accordingly.
The hearing decision deadline is verified to fall no later than 45 days after the end of the resolution period, computed deterministically.
The file includes a FAPE analysis mapping the student's IEP and progress against the 'appropriately ambitious' standard, with case-law citations.
A procedural-compliance checklist verifies that the district's procedural safeguards notice was provided at each relevant trigger point.
The drafted response addresses each element of the complaint: student name, issue description, proposed resolution, and factual basis.
AI extracts and drafts. Deterministic rules — running as code, outside the model — decide what is complete. A licensed attorney of record signs every release. That order is never reversed.
Upload the redacted student record set. We return a free completeness read: which statutory elements and timeline items you already have, and which are missing.
As your authorized clerical agent, we parse IEPs, evaluations, service logs, correspondence, and attendance records into a chronological timeline, corroborated across sources.
The five defense-file elements are drafted from your validated data and the §300 rule pack into field-locked templates — no legal opinions, no invented facts.
Timeline dates reconcile to the statutory clock to the day; the FAPE analysis is checked against the Endrew F. standard; the procedural-compliance checklist is resolved. Any failure blocks release.
A licensed special-education defense attorney reviews the exception queue and signs the release. High-value or complex cases route to senior counsel review first.
You receive the file: timeline, gap analysis, exhibit index, witness list, drafted response, settlement-exposure memo, and statutory calendar — ready for the attorney of record to review, correct, and file.
The deliverable is completeness itself — every statutory element and timeline item accounted for or explicitly exception-coded. Nothing is left implicit.
The gates that decide completeness are code, not a model's opinion. A drafting error cannot slip past a regulatory requirement.
We prepare documentation and run searches as your clerical agent. We never contact the parent, give legal advice, or represent the district at hearing.
Simple, predictable, and aligned with a documentation standard — not a cut of any settlement or recovery.
Start with a free Gap Scan. Send your redacted student record set and we'll return a completeness read against every subsection of 34 CFR §300.510-300.515.
Documentation-completeness service · not legal advice · the district's attorney of record files every document.