Every required item, crosswalked to your product
A line-by-line matrix: each submittal item the section requires, matched against your proposed product's attributes, every row citing the exact source page on the cut sheet. No row without a source.
Send us one CSI spec section and the manufacturer cut sheets for the product you intend to furnish. We send back a GC/AE-ready First-Pass Product Data Pack — compliance matrix, highlighted cut sheets, a missing-item chase list, and a filled transmittal — with a trade specialist's QA signature, delivered before your submittal due date.
Rejection is rarely about craftsmanship — it's a document-completeness failure the AE catches before they ever review the product. These are the bounce modes that trigger Revise and Resubmit and stall the buyout of your long-lead equipment.
General catalog submitted without highlighting the applicable model on the multi-page cut sheet. Under typical Division 01 §013300 language, an unmarked catalog is returned without review.
A named certification or test report is missing — the UL listing, AHRI rating, or NSF certificate the section calls out by name isn't attached.
Wrong model or configuration versus the basis-of-design, or a warranty term that doesn't match the specified duration.
The transmittal is missing the spec-section reference, or a matrix row cites no source page — so the reviewer can't verify the claim and bounces the whole packet.
Every First-Pass Product Data Pack covers exactly one CSI section (for example §26 05 19 conductors, or a Div 22/23 equipment section) and ships as a single reviewable package with a rejection-risk score.
A line-by-line matrix: each submittal item the section requires, matched against your proposed product's attributes, every row citing the exact source page on the cut sheet. No row without a source.
Your manufacturer cut sheets, with the specified model, options, and performance values marked — so the AE reviews the product instead of returning an unmarked catalog.
An explicit list of any missing listing, test report, or warranty — each with a draft email to the manufacturer's rep so you can close the gap fast, not hunt for it.
A completed transmittal that fronts the pack with the correct section number and upload instructions for Procore, Autodesk Build (ACC), or email — whichever the GC uses.
The AI extracts and drafts. Deterministic rules fail any packet with a hard gap. A trade-aware specialist QAs every pack, and you attest the product selection before it goes to the GC. That order never changes.
Upload the spec section (plus the Division 01 submittal procedures if you have them), the manufacturer cut sheets for the product you intend to furnish, any certificates you already hold, and prior AE comments if the section already bounced.
The engine pulls the required submittal-item list from the section, OCRs and parses the cut sheets, matches numeric performance attributes, and drafts the compliance matrix and gap list — every row tied to a source page.
Rules — not the model — fail the packet on any catalog page without a highlight, any missing named cert type, any blank transmittal field, or any matrix row without a source page. A hard fail blocks delivery.
A trade-aware specialist reviews the attribute match and completeness, annotates the highlights, and escalates any ambiguous performance clause. No pack ships without a specialist's QA signature.
You confirm the pack reflects the product you intend to furnish. We deliver the package as a ZIP with upload instructions; you submit it to the GC portal under your own name.
One rejection runs about $805 in admin plus weeks of delay. A pack costs a fraction of that, and far less than a submittals coordinator you'd only need between jobs.
If your package is returned solely for completeness items we marked as clear, we rebuild the resubmittal at no additional pack fee, once. We sell completeness — not the AE's design preference, and never a guaranteed approval. You can stop after any single pack; there is no retainer to start.
CutSheet Clear is in pilot. Rather than post invented testimonials or results, these slots fill in as real packs ship. Each one is keyed to a real future event.
[PLACEHOLDER — the share of pilot packs that draw Approved / Approved as Noted / Furnish as Noted on completeness will appear here after the first 20 packs.]
[PLACEHOLDER — a redacted before/after of a real rejected package rebuilt to clear will appear here once a pilot customer approves publication.]
[PLACEHOLDER — a named specialty-trade customer reference will appear here after their first buyout milestone. No testimonial is shown before it is real.]
Product-data submittals are contractual and administrative under the construction documents and Division 01 procedures — not professional engineering. CutSheet Clear stays strictly on the documentation side of that line.
Extract required items, OCR and highlight cut sheets, build the compliance matrix, draft chase emails, assemble the transmittal, and QA completeness. Documentation preparation only.
Select the product, attest that the pack reflects your intended furnish, and upload to the GC portal. You remain responsible for contract compliance and means-and-methods.
Issue review actions and approve any substitution or "or-equal." CutSheet Clear does not stamp drawings, certify code compliance, or claim a product was "approved."
Start with a free Rejection Risk Scan. Send one prior rejected product-data package (or the spec section you're worried about), and we'll return the exact completeness gaps and what a First-Pass Product Data Pack would rebuild — before your buyout date.
Product-data documentation service · not a design professional, not engineering or legal advice · you select the product and submit to the GC.