Investigation timeline
A chronological case timeline is constructed from all evidence, with each allegation mapped to the date it was reported, investigated, and resolved.
CaseBuilt assembles a documentation-complete investigation file — chronological case timeline, evidence matrix, exhibit binder, and draft investigative report — checked against 34 CFR Part 106 and applicable state mini-Title-IX statutes before a certified human investigator signs the final report.
Every formal Title IX complaint triggers a mandatory, procedurally rigid investigation — interviews, evidence gathering, a written report, and a live hearing. Miss a required step, overlook a contradictory witness account, or fail to document the timeline properly, and the institution faces a 'deliberate indifference' lawsuit or an OCR compliance review.
Most campuses staff this with 1-2 FTEs regardless of caseload volatility, or hire outside investigators at $250-1,250/hour. The result: either a backlog of cases or a per-case cost that can exceed $13,000.
CaseBuilt exists to close that gap with a single, exhaustive standard applied identically to every case.
We do not summarize the law and hope. Every case is scored against a versioned rule pack tied to the exact text of 34 CFR Part 106 and applicable state mini-Title-IX statutes. These are the provisions each file is held to.
A chronological case timeline is constructed from all evidence, with each allegation mapped to the date it was reported, investigated, and resolved.
Every piece of evidence is cataloged, cross-referenced to each allegation, and flagged for corroboration or contradiction across witness accounts.
A first-draft report is produced in the institution's required format, summarizing the allegations, evidence, and witness statements — ready for the investigator's final review and signature.
All interviews are conducted by an ATIXA-credentialed human investigator; the AI prepares question guides and cross-reference notes but never interviews a party.
For institutions in California, New York, and other states with independent investigation obligations, the file is checked against the applicable state statute.
Credibility determinations are made exclusively by the human investigator; the AI flags inconsistencies but never assigns weight or credibility.
AI extracts and drafts. Deterministic rules — running as code, outside the model — decide what is complete. A certified human investigator signs every release. That order is never reversed.
Upload the complaint and any existing evidence. We return a free completeness read: which regulatory elements and evidence categories you already have, and which are missing.
Documents, chat exports, and interview recordings are uploaded through a secure portal. The AI normalizes them into a structured case file, extracting dates, parties, and key statements.
A chronological case timeline and evidence matrix are built automatically, cross-referencing every allegation against the evidence and flagging corroboration and contradiction.
A first-draft investigative report is produced in the institution's required format, summarizing the allegations, evidence, and witness statements — no legal opinions, no invented facts.
An ATIXA-credentialed human investigator reviews the draft, conducts all interviews personally, makes all credibility determinations, and revises the report as needed.
The investigator signs the final report. You receive the complete file: timeline, evidence matrix, exhibit binder, and signed report — ready for the institution's hearing or resolution process.
The deliverable is completeness itself — every regulatory element and evidence category accounted for or explicitly exception-coded. Nothing is left implicit.
The gates that decide completeness are code, not a model's opinion. A drafting error cannot slip past a regulatory requirement.
We prepare documentation and run evidence analysis as your clerical agent. We never interview parties, make credibility determinations, or provide legal advice.
Simple, predictable, and aligned with a documentation standard — not a cut of any settlement or award.
Start with a free Case Gap Scan. Send your complaint and evidence and we'll return a completeness read against every subsection of 34 CFR Part 106.
Documentation-completeness service · not legal advice · the institution retains all decision-making authority.