70% completion rate
Cohort completion computed from verified enrollment and attendance records — no estimates, no self-reported data.
PellReady assembles a documentation-complete Program Eligibility Dossier — every statutory element, every required outcome computation, the value-test model, the state application, and the ED E-App updates — checked against the letter of the final rule (FR 2026-10013) before a former financial-aid director releases it.
A community college's Workforce Pell eligibility is only as strong as the evidence behind it. Miss the 70% completion rate, fail to prove job placement within 180 days, skip the earnings-vs-tuition value test, or mis-time the state approval process — and the program can be rejected, delayed, or expose the institution to audit liability.
Most workforce divisions run noncredit programs that live outside the student-information and financial-aid systems. The completion, placement, and wage evidence the applications demand does not exist in reportable form. At least a quarter of states have no wage-outcome data pipeline at all.
PellReady exists to close that gap with a single, exhaustive standard applied identically to every file.
We do not summarize the law and hope. Every dossier is scored against a versioned rule pack tied to the exact text of FR 2026-10013. These are the provisions each pack is held to.
Cohort completion computed from verified enrollment and attendance records — no estimates, no self-reported data.
Placement within 180 days of program completion, corroborated by state wage records or employer verification.
Median earnings of completers must exceed total tuition and fees by at least 1.5x, modeled deterministically.
Program must have been offered for at least one year prior to application, evidenced by catalog and enrollment records.
State application prepared and submitted per governor's process, with evidence of submission and approval.
Electronic Application and Eligibility Certification Addendum updated with program details and outcome attestations.
AI extracts and drafts. Deterministic rules — running as code, outside the model — decide what is complete. A former financial-aid director signs every release. That order is never reversed.
Upload program catalog, enrollment data, and placement records. We return a free completeness read: which statutory elements and evidence you already have, and which are missing.
As your authorized clerical agent, we collect completion, placement, and wage data from your systems and state sources, and build the outcome evidence file.
The eligibility dossier is drafted from your validated data and the FR 2026-10013 rule pack into field-locked templates — no legal opinions, no invented facts.
Completion and placement rates reconcile to source data; value test is computed; state application is checked for completeness; any failure blocks release.
A former financial-aid director reviews the exception queue and signs the release. High-value or complex programs route to attorney review first.
You receive the dossier: outcome evidence file, value-test model, state application, ED E-App updates, and compliance calendar — ready for the institution to certify and submit.
The deliverable is completeness itself — every statutory element and evidence item accounted for or explicitly exception-coded. Nothing is left implicit.
The gates that decide completeness are code, not a model's opinion. A drafting error cannot slip past a statutory requirement.
We prepare documentation and run data reconciliation as your clerical agent. We never contact students, give legal advice, or certify outcomes.
Simple, predictable, and aligned with a documentation standard — not a cut of any grant.
Start with a free Program Gap Scan. Send your program catalog and outcome data and we'll return a completeness read against every subsection of FR 2026-10013.
Documentation-completeness service · not legal advice · the institution certifies every submission.